Byline:
|
|
Yun Zhao
|
Issue:
|
|
|
Cite as:
|
|
26 John Marshall J. of Comp. & Info. Law 395
|
Abstract:
|
|
The article notes the importance of looking into the position of Chinese federal courts to deal with cases brought by losing parties against the panel decisions in the administrative arbitration procedure. The author notes that federal courts do not give much consideration to panel decisions. Other problems also tend to arise as to the legal effect of panel decisions. The paper examines these problems, with reference to China’s current court practice. Part II of the paper offers an overview of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (“UDRP”) process, and its rules regarding possible court proceedings. Part III examines China’s current court practice in dealing with domain name disputes. Part IV argues that panel decisions should be final, and suggests means to dispel the concerns from various parties. Part V concludes that improvements in the UDRP procedures are vital to the continued success of the domain name system, and further development of online dispute resolution (“ODR”).
|
Author Footnote:
|
|
Yun Zhao is an Associate Professor and serves as the Acting Associate Dean of China Affairs at the University of Hong Kong. Mr. Zhao’s former positions at the City University of Hong Kong include LLM Program Leader, JSD Associate Program Leader, Acting LLM Program Leader, Co-Editor-in-Chief of School Newsletter, and membership on a variety of other committees and projects. Mr. Zhao’s distinguished career also includes roles as Editor in Chief of Law Reviews, acting as a legal advisor, serving as a lecturer, and roles as a national correspondent. Mr. Zhao’s has authored a multitude of law review articles and contributed to the publication of many books by writing entire chapters.
|
|
Related Articles:
|
| |
