VOL. XIX • Fall 2000 • NO. 1 Cite as: 19 John Marshall J. of Comp. & Info. Law

Jump to back issue... ----------------- Vol. XXVIII • Winter 2010 • NO. 2Vol. XXVIII • Fall 2010 • NO. 1Vol. XXVII • • NO. 4Vol. XXVII • • NO. 3Vol. XXVII • • NO. 2Vol. XXVII • • NO. 1Vol. XXVI • Summer 2009 • NO. 4Vol. XXVI • Spring 2009 • NO. 3Vol. XXVI • Winter 2008 • NO. 2Vol. XXVI • Fall 2008 • NO. 1Vol. XXV • Symposium Issue • NO. 4Vol. XXV • Summer 2008 • NO. 3Vol. XXV • Spring 2008 • NO. 2Vol. XXV • Winter 2007 • NO. 1Vol. XXIV • Summer 2006 • NO. 4Vol. XXIV • Spring 2006 • NO. 3Vol. XXIV • Winter 2006 • NO. 2Vol. XXII • Spring 2004 • NO. 3Vol. XXIII • Summer 2005 • NO. 4Vol. XXIV • Fall 2005 • NO. 1Vol. XXIII • Spring 2005 • NO. 3Vol. XXIII • Winter 2005 • NO. 2Vol. XXIII • Fall 2004 • NO. 1Vol. XXII • Summer 2004 • NO. 4Vol. XXII • Winter 2004 • NO. 2Vol. XXII • Fall 2003 • NO. 1Vol. XXI • Summer 2003 • NO. 4Vol. XXI • Spring 2003 • NO. 3Vol. XXI • Winter 2003 • NO. 2Vol. XXI • Fall 2002 • NO. 1Vol. XX • Summer 2002 • NO. 4Vol. XX • Spring 2002 • NO. 3Vol. XX • Winter 2002 • NO. 2Vol. XX • Fall 2001 • NO. 1Vol. XIX • Summer 2001 • NO. 4Vol. XIX • Spring 2001 • NO. 3Vol. XIX • Winter 2001 • NO. 2Vol. XIX • Fall 2000 • NO. 1Vol. XVIII • Summer 2000 • NO. 4Vol. XVIII • Spring 2000 • NO. 3Vol. XVIII • Winter 2000 • NO. 2Vol. XVIII • Fall 1999 • NO. 1Vol. XVII • Summer 1999 • NO. 4Vol. XVII • Spring 1999 • NO. 3Vol. XVII • Winter 1999 • NO. 2Vol. XVII • Fall 1998 • NO. 1Vol. XVI • Summer 1998 • NO. 4Vol. XVI • Spring 1998 • NO. 3Vol. XVI • Winter 1998 • NO. 2Vol. XVI • Fall 1997 • NO. 1Vol. XV • Summer 1997 • NO. 4Vol. XV • Spring 1997 • NO. 3Vol. XV • Winter 1997 • NO. 2Vol. XV • Fall 1996 • NO. 1Vol. XIV • Summer 1996 • NO. 4Vol. XIV • Spring 1996 • NO. 3Vol. XIV • Winter 1996 • NO. 2Vol. XIV • Fall 1995 • NO. 1Vol. XIII • Summer 1995 • NO. 4Vol. XIII • Spring 1995 • NO. 3Vol. XIII • Winter 1995 • NO. 2Vol. XIII • Fall 1994 • NO. 1Vol. XII • Spring 1994 • NO. 4Vol. XII • October 1993 • NO. 3

Articles

The Case for a US Privacy Commissioner: A Canadian Commissioner’s Perspective

William S. Challis & Dr. Ann Cavoukian

Regulating the Free Flow of Information: a Privacy Czar as the Ultimate Big Brother

Jonathan M. Winer

Recent Developments in Private Sector Personal Data Protection in Australia: Will There Be an Upside Down Under

Paul Kelly

Protecting Individual On-Line Privacy Rights: Making the Case for a Separately Dedicated, Independent Regulatory Agency

Jack Karnes

The De Facto Federal Privacy Commission

Steven Hetcher

Pornography, Privacy, and Digital Self-Help

Tom W. Bell

Toward an Architecture for the Virtual World

Paul Toscano

The Establishment Of A U.S. Federal Data Protection Agency To Define and Regulate Internet Privacy and Its Impact on US-China Relations: Marco Polo, Where are you?

Omar Saleem

Book Review

Database Nation: Does Information Technology of the 21st Century Pose a Daunting Threat to Personal Privacy in America

Robert S. Gurwin

2000 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law

Whether the Information Disseminated by the Defendant Invaded the Plaintiff’s Privacy as Defined by the Restatement (Second) of Torts Governing Public Disclosure of Private Facts and Whether Defendant’s Use of Cookie Technology to gather the Information Displayed About the Plaintiff Constituted an Invasion of Her Privacy

Robert S. Gurwin & Nicole D. Milos

Brief for the Petitioner

Levin College of Law, University of Florida

Brief for the Respondent

South Texas College of Law