VOL. XXII • Fall 2003 • NO. 1 Cite as: 22 John Marshall J. of Comp. & Info. Law

Jump to back issue... ----------------- Vol. XXVIII • Fall 2010 • NO. 1Vol. XXVII • • NO. 4Vol. XXVII • • NO. 3Vol. XXVII • • NO. 2Vol. XXVII • • NO. 1Vol. XXVI • Summer 2009 • NO. 4Vol. XXVI • Spring 2009 • NO. 3Vol. XXVI • Winter 2008 • NO. 2Vol. XXVI • Fall 2008 • NO. 1Vol. XXV • Symposium Issue • NO. 4Vol. XXV • Summer 2008 • NO. 3Vol. XXV • Spring 2008 • NO. 2Vol. XXV • Winter 2007 • NO. 1Vol. XXIV • Summer 2006 • NO. 4Vol. XXIV • Spring 2006 • NO. 3Vol. XXIV • Winter 2006 • NO. 2Vol. XXII • Spring 2004 • NO. 3Vol. XXIII • Summer 2005 • NO. 4Vol. XXIV • Fall 2005 • NO. 1Vol. XXIII • Spring 2005 • NO. 3Vol. XXIII • Winter 2005 • NO. 2Vol. XXIII • Fall 2004 • NO. 1Vol. XXII • Summer 2004 • NO. 4Vol. XXII • Winter 2004 • NO. 2Vol. XXII • Fall 2003 • NO. 1Vol. XXI • Summer 2003 • NO. 4Vol. XXI • Spring 2003 • NO. 3Vol. XXI • Winter 2003 • NO. 2Vol. XXI • Fall 2002 • NO. 1Vol. XX • Summer 2002 • NO. 4Vol. XX • Spring 2002 • NO. 3Vol. XX • Winter 2002 • NO. 2Vol. XX • Fall 2001 • NO. 1Vol. XIX • Summer 2001 • NO. 4Vol. XIX • Spring 2001 • NO. 3Vol. XIX • Winter 2001 • NO. 2Vol. XIX • Fall 2000 • NO. 1Vol. XVIII • Summer 2000 • NO. 4Vol. XVIII • Spring 2000 • NO. 3Vol. XVIII • Winter 2000 • NO. 2Vol. XVIII • Fall 1999 • NO. 1Vol. XVII • Summer 1999 • NO. 4Vol. XVII • Spring 1999 • NO. 3Vol. XVII • Winter 1999 • NO. 2Vol. XVII • Fall 1998 • NO. 1Vol. XVI • Summer 1998 • NO. 4Vol. XVI • Spring 1998 • NO. 3Vol. XVI • Winter 1998 • NO. 2Vol. XVI • Fall 1997 • NO. 1Vol. XV • Summer 1997 • NO. 4Vol. XV • Spring 1997 • NO. 3Vol. XV • Winter 1997 • NO. 2Vol. XV • Fall 1996 • NO. 1Vol. XIV • Summer 1996 • NO. 4Vol. XIV • Spring 1996 • NO. 3Vol. XIV • Winter 1996 • NO. 2Vol. XIV • Fall 1995 • NO. 1Vol. XIII • Summer 1995 • NO. 4Vol. XIII • Spring 1995 • NO. 3Vol. XIII • Winter 1995 • NO. 2Vol. XIII • Fall 1994 • NO. 1Vol. XII • Spring 1994 • NO. 4Vol. XII • October 1993 • NO. 3

Articles

Spam Legislation in the United States

Davd E. Sorkin

Where’s the Beef? Dissecting Spam’s Purported Harms

Eric Goldman

After CAN-SPAM, How States Can Stay Relevant in the Fight Against Unwanted Messages: How a Children’s Protection Registry Can be Effective, and is Not Preempted, Under the New Federal Anti-Spam Law

Matthew B. Prince and Patrick A. Shea

The Do-Not-Call Registry Model is Not the Answer to Spam

Richard C. Balough

Spamming for Legal Services: A Constitutional Right Within a Regulatory Quagmire

William E. Hornsby

Examination of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct Pertaining to the Marketing of Legal Services in Cyberspace

Matthew T. Rollins

Vendor Liability for Advertising in Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail

Anne P. Mitchell

Spam and Beyond: Freedom, Efficiency, and the Regulation of E-mail Advertising

Richard Warner

A Further Darkside to Unsolicited Commercial E-mail? An Assessment of Potential Employer Liability for Spam E-mail

Ben Dahl

Case Notes

Casenote on Intel v. Hamidi

J. Brian Beckham

Comments

Wireless Spam This Way Comes

Bridget O’Neill

2003 John Marshall International Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law

Bench Memorandum

Briefs for Petitioners

Cleveland Marshall College of Law/Southwestern College of Law

Briefs for Respondent

Texas Tech University School of Law